Saturday, 18 May 2019

FAQ on various Question on DPT -3 Return


FAQ on various Question on DPT -3


Question: - Whether loan received from the employee it liable to report in DPT-3?
Professional Opinion:-
Yes, it is liable to report under DPT-3, because it is also a loan from employee.

Question: - Whether advance received from the customer for provision of services or supplies of Goods it liable to report in DPT-3?
Professional Opinion:-
Yes, it is liable to report under DPT-3. Rule 2 (1) (C) of the Deposit Rules not covered it into the meaning of Deposit. But for the Purpose of DPT-3, any amount received in advance in the course of or the purpose of the company business, for the supply of business or provision of the service or as a security deposit for the performance of the contract for supply of goods or provisions of services is liable to report.

Question: - Whether NBFC is liable to report in DPT-3?
Professional Opinion:-
Yes, NBFC are liable to report under DPT-3, because only Government Companies is exempted.

Question: - My Client is taken the loan before 01.04.2014 and repaid the same before 31.03.2019. Whether such loan is liable to report?
Professional Opinion:-
No, it is clearly mentioned in the notification that only all outstanding receipts of money or loan as on 31.03.2019 is liable to report in DPT-3. So your dues is clear before 31.03.2019, hence no dues as on reporting date, so you are not liable to report such loan.

Question: - My Client is taken the loan before 01.04.2014 and same is outstanding as on 31.03.2019. Whether such loan is liable to report?
Professional Opinion:-
Yes, it is covered under outstanding receipts of the money or loan hence liable to report.

Question: - If a company does not accept any loan or does not having any outstanding loan, then also company need to comply with the provisions of this rule?
 Professional Opinion:-

If company does not accept loan or does not having any outstanding loan, there is no need to comply with the provisions of this rule.


Question: - Whether information about secured loan, unsecured loan, ECB, loans between holding and subsidiary is required to be furnished?
Professional Opinion:-
There is no specific exemption in the said notification regarding the above referred loan, so, it can be concluded that information about each and every outstanding loan as on 31.03.2019 is required to be furnished.

Question: - What does ‘Particulars not considered as deposit’ means?
Professional Opinion:-
Loan exempted under deposit rules and section 73 shall be considered as particular of non-considered as deposit. For example Loan from companies, Directors, Banks, Financial Institutions, Members etc. Thus every loan taken by company is covered in Rule 16.

Question: - If company received loan from Holding Company, Subsidiary Company or Associate Company. Whether company need to file DPT-3?
Professional Opinion:-
As per rule 16 A DPT-3 is required to file for each and every loan received by the company. Therefore, Company required filing DPT-3 even for loan from Holding, Subsidiary or Associate Company.

Question: - If company does not accept loan or does not having any outstanding loan. Whether need to file DPT-3?
Professional Opinion:-

If company does not accept loan or does not having any outstanding loan, there is no need to comply with the provisions of this rule.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Important Updated in relation Annual Filing & Extension of Companies

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) on  Saturday vide  General Circular no. 22/2021 dated: 29/12/2021 ,  gave relaxation on levy of addi...